Lye-Free Soapmaking

Methods, Skin Benefits, and Our Superior Base

Soap can be made by several methods – Cold Process, Hot Process, Rebatch, and Melt-and-Pour – each with distinct advantages and drawbacks (especially for skin). A key benefit of our approach is that our soap base is pre-saponified (“lye-free”), so the user never handles caustic NaOH (Sodium Hydroxide / caustic soda / lye). We compare each method’s pros & cons (including skin effects) and explain why our formula’s ingredients (high in humectants, gentle surfactants, etc.) make it especially skin-friendly.

Cold Process (Traditional)

  • Pros: Fully customizable with any oils or additives; produces a hard, long-lasting bar and retains all its natural glycerin (a moisturizing byproduct). Many soapmakers praise cold-processed soap as “gentle on the skin” with nourishing lather.
  • Cons: Requires handling lye (sodium hydroxide) during mixing, which can be dangerous if mishandled. It also needs a 4–6 week cure time before use, tying up inventory and delaying availability. The high pH (around 9–10) during cure can accelerate color changes in some ingredients (colors turn dull).
  • Skin Benefits/Drawbacks: Properly cured cold-process soap contains glycerin and is generally moisturizing. The American Academy of Dermatology notes glycerin “hydrates the outer layer of the skin, improves barrier function, and relieves dry skin”. However, if a cold bar isn’t fully cured, residual lye or very high pH can irritate sensitive skin.

Hot Process

  • Pros: Adds heat to speed up saponification, so the soap can be cut and used in days rather than weeks. Like cold process, it allows customization of oils but yields a rustic, cottage-cheese texture. Hot-processed bars are often fully saponified immediately, making them “gentle enough to use” almost right away.
  • Cons: Appearance is coarse/rustic, and heat can “burn off” delicate fragrances. Swirling or layering designs are difficult due to the thicker batter. As with cold process, high pH means more caution is needed with additives.
  • Skin Benefits/Drawbacks: Hot-process bars still contain natural glycerin, providing hydration similar to cold-process. Their nearly-finished state means no risk of uncured lye in the final bar. Overall, they are as skin-friendly as cold-process, with the main drawback being their rough texture rather than any chemical issue.

Rebatching (Hand Milling)

  • Pros: Essentially remelts an existing cured soap, so no new lye is needed. You can salvage or adjust batches that didn’t turn out right, and it typically only needs ~1–2 weeks of new “cure” time. Cleanup is easy and it’s very beginner-friendly.
  • Cons: Since the base soap has already saponified, you cannot change the original recipe (oils/butters). Fragrances or botanicals may fade when heated again, and the texture remains rustic. It’s harder to suspend swirls or layers (mixing is thick).
  • Skin Benefits/Drawbacks: Rebatching retains whatever glycerin and ingredients were in the original soap. In other words, its skin benefits are essentially the same as the original soap’s (it neither adds nor loses glycerin). It is fully safe (no lye contact) and can use all the same nourishing additives of the original formula.

Melt-and-Pour (Pre-Made Base)

  • Pros: No lye at all for the soapmaker – the soap is fully cooked beforehand. It’s safe for kids/novices, requires no safety gear, and hardens within hours with no curing time. This makes it extremely convenient and foolproof. Translucent bases can embed glitter/objects (light shows through), and layers adhere easily. Fragrances won’t “lock” (no saponification issues).
  • Cons: The base formula is fixed – you can only add colorants or heat-stable additives (no fresh milks/purees). Melted soap is thinner and additives can sink if poured hot. Extra glycerin is present, so finished bars are prone to “sweating” (glycerin drawing moisture). They also tend to be softer and not as long-lasting in use as well-cured cold-process bars.
  • Skin Benefits/Drawbacks: Melt-and-pour soap typically contains high glycerin content (often with added moisturizers), which makes it very skin-friendly. Glycerin is a powerful humectant that attracts moisture – glycerin bars are known to be “non-drying” and soothing even for sensitive skin. The trade-off is that too much glycerin can make the bar sticky or sweat in humid conditions. Overall, melt-and-pour bars are gentle, though their softness means they wear down faster on the skin.

Why Our Lye-Free Base Excels

Our soap base combines the convenience of no-lye methods with a formulation optimized for skin health. In particular:

  • Safe & Ready-to-Use: Being pre-saponified (like melt-and-pour), no caustic lye is handled by the user. The bars cure immediately and are pH-stable, eliminating any risk of uncured alkaline burn. This aligns with the advice that products should “give due consideration to the pH” so they are skin-friendly.
  • High Humectant Content: We include multiple moisturizers to counteract soap’s drying tendency. Glycerin (2.5–5%) and sorbitol (10–20%) are natural humectants that pull water into the skin. Indeed, studies note that glycerin is “the most effective humectant” for increasing hydration of the outer skin layer, and sorbitol similarly “draws moisture from the air” to hydrate and plump skin. We also add propylene glycol (5–10%), which “helps pull moisture to the skin and helps skin absorb nourishing ingredients”. By contrast, many conventional handmade soaps lose the glycerin byproduct (making them drier), whereas our formula specifically retains it for a moisturizing effect.
  • Gentle Surfactant Blend: The base contains a balanced mix of surfactants and fatty acid salts. We use sodium laureth sulfate (SLES, 5–10%) and limit sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) to about 1–2.5%. SLES is milder than SLS; it produces a creamy lather without the harshness of raw SLS. The formula also includes sodium stearate, laurate, myristate and small amounts of lauric/myristic acid (all from plant fats). These create rich foam and bar hardness. Notably, lauric acid has antimicrobial cleansing properties, which may even benefit acne-prone skin (it’s been shown to inhibit Propionibacterium acnes).
  • Barrier-Friendly Additives: We incorporate ingredients to round out mildness. A bit of sucrose (5–10%) boosts lather volume (sugar increases viscosity and foam retention). Salt (sodium chloride) (1–2.5%) hardens the bar and also aids lather. These additions do not harm skin. Citric acid (used in small amounts by some formulas) helps neutralize excess alkali and keeps the pH from being too harsh. We also use chelating agents (iminodisuccinate, etidronate) to stabilize the base (prevent metal ions from breaking down soaps) without affecting skin.
  • Dermatological Endorsement: Our emphasis on humectants and barrier-supporting ingredients is supported by dermatology sources. For example, the American Academy of Dermatology highlights that glycerin “hydrates the outer layer of the skin” and “improves skin barrier function”, protecting against irritation. Propylene glycol and sorbitol are also widely used in skincare because they “prevent the drying effect of surfactants” and are non-sensitizing. Cocamidopropyl betaine (used in some other bases) is indeed a very mild surfactant, but our formula achieves gentleness by combining multiple humectants and a predominantly SLES-based cleanser.
  • Natural-Origin Composition: Our soap base is 84.8% “natural origin” by ISO 16128 standards, meaning most of its ingredients are plant- or mineral-derived. This is high compared to many commercial bases. In practical terms, we rely on botanical fatty acids and sugar alcohols rather than petrochemical additives. This appeals to consumers seeking natural products.
  • Comparison with Other Bases: For instance, other soap bases might contain high glycerin (10–25%) but lack other humectants, or small amounts of coconut/sunflower oils (≤1%) that give modest occlusive/moisturizing effect. We instead ensure synergy: glycerin and sorbitol together complement each other’s water-binding, and PG helps them penetrate the outermost layer skin. Ultimately, our formulation provides deep cleansing and skin moisturization, whereas a leaner base might clean but leave skin tight.

In summary, each soapmaking method has trade-offs: cold/hot processes yield traditional glycerin-rich bars (good for skin if done properly) but involve lye and long cures, whereas melt-and-pour/rebatch avoid lye but sacrifice some customization. Our base merges the best of both worlds by eliminating end-user lye exposure and incorporating dermatologically beneficial ingredients. The ample humectants (supported by studies on glycerin and sorbitol), gentle surfactant blend, and measured additives make it exceptionally nourishing. In practical terms, consumers using our lye-free base get a gentle, hydrating soap that is safe to handle and supported by scientific understanding of skin care ingredients.

Sources:

Shopping Cart
Scroll to Top